AI model matchup
Sakana Namazu vs Qwen3.7-Plus
A side-by-side look at published capability scores, listed API pricing, speed, context, and license - to help you decide which trade-offs fit your work.
Sakana NamazuvsQwen3.7-Plus
Qwen3.7-Plus leads the RankLLMs Index by 0.1 points (43.3 vs 43.2). Verified API Pricing: $0.95 (Sakana Namazu) vs $0.50 (Qwen3.7-Plus) per 1M tokens.
Capability profile
Speed duel
tpsPrice duel
$/1MShorter bar = cheaper. Blended per 1M tokens.
| Metric | Sakana Namazu | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| RankLLMs Overall Score | 43.2 pts | 43.3 pts ▲ |
| Reasoning | 43.0 | 43.6 ▲ |
| Coding | 38.5 ▲ | 32.5 |
| Agentic Tool Use | 0.0 | 26.1 ▲ |
| Code Arena Elo | null | 1235 |
| Inference Speed | 70 tps ▲ | 50 tps |
| API Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.95 | $0.50 ▲ |
| Context Window | 262K | 1M |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Global Rank | #53 | #52 ▲ |
Decision notes
What the numbers suggest
Qwen3.7-Plus leads the RankLLMs overall score by 0.1 points. Qwen3.7-Plus has the lower listed API rate ($0.50 per 1M tokens).
Treat the overall index as a starting point, then prioritize the benchmark that resembles your task. Published scores and provider pricing can change; this comparison does not represent a first-party test of either model.
- Overall index
- Qwen3.7-Plus leads
- 43.2 to 43.3 pts
- Coding score
- Sakana Namazu leads
- 38.5 to 32.5 pts
- Reasoning score
- Qwen3.7-Plus leads
- 43.0 to 43.6 pts
- Agentic score
- Qwen3.7-Plus leads
- 0.0 to 26.1 pts
Choose by workload
Which profile fits your use?
Sakana AI
Consider Sakana Namazu when
your workload gives more weight to the higher listed coding score. Compare those signals with your own task mix, latency needs, and budget.
View Sakana Namazu profileQwen / Alibaba
Consider Qwen3.7-Plus when
your workload gives more weight to the higher listed reasoning score, the higher overall index score, the lower listed API rate. Compare those signals with your own task mix, latency needs, and budget.
View Qwen3.7-Plus profile