AI model matchup
Hy4 Preview vs GLM-5.3
A side-by-side look at published capability scores, listed API pricing, speed, context, and license - to help you decide which trade-offs fit your work.
Hy4 PreviewvsGLM-5.3
GLM-5.3 leads the RankLLMs Index by 0.2 points (55.4 vs 55.2). Verified API Pricing: Free/Open Source (Hy4 Preview) vs $1.40 (GLM-5.3) per 1M tokens.
Capability profile
Speed duel
tpsPrice duel
$/1MShorter bar = cheaper. Blended per 1M tokens.
| Metric | Hy4 Preview | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| RankLLMs Overall Score | 55.2 pts | 55.4 pts ▲ |
| Reasoning | 58.5 | 62.5 ▲ |
| Coding | 77.0 | 77.8 ▲ |
| Agentic Tool Use | 49.0 | 51.0 ▲ |
| Code Arena Elo | null | 1769 |
| Inference Speed | 60 tps ▲ | 57 tps |
| API Price (per 1M tokens) | Free/Open Source | $1.40 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Global Rank | #17 | #16 ▲ |
Decision notes
What the numbers suggest
GLM-5.3 leads the RankLLMs overall score by 0.2 points. Hy4 Preview has the lower listed API rate (Free/Open Source per 1M tokens).
Treat the overall index as a starting point, then prioritize the benchmark that resembles your task. Published scores and provider pricing can change; this comparison does not represent a first-party test of either model.
- Overall index
- GLM-5.3 leads
- 55.2 to 55.4 pts
- Coding score
- GLM-5.3 leads
- 77.0 to 77.8 pts
- Reasoning score
- GLM-5.3 leads
- 58.5 to 62.5 pts
- Agentic score
- GLM-5.3 leads
- 49.0 to 51.0 pts
Choose by workload
Which profile fits your use?
Tencent
Consider Hy4 Preview when
your workload gives more weight to the lower listed API rate. Compare those signals with your own task mix, latency needs, and budget.
View Hy4 Preview profileZhipu AI
Consider GLM-5.3 when
your workload gives more weight to the higher listed coding score, the higher listed reasoning score, the higher overall index score. Compare those signals with your own task mix, latency needs, and budget.
View GLM-5.3 profile