Claude Opus 4.8
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Claude Opus 4.8 against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Claude Opus 4.8 Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic is a flagship reasoning model scoring 54.8 overall with 1890 GDPVal-AA Elo, 69.2% on SWE-Pro, and 83.4% on OSWorld.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •Strong knowledge work on GDPVal-AA (1890 Elo) and SWE-Pro (69.2%)
- •High frontend synthesis on QwenReactBench (1694 Elo) and CoWorkBench (72.3%)
- •Solid desktop computer use on OSWorld-Verified (83.4%) and 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.1
Limitations & Considerations
- •Higher API inference price per 1M tokens ($7.22)
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Claude Opus 4.8 is developed by Anthropic as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, Claude Opus 4.8 registers an overall benchmark rating of 54.8 / 100.
Operating under a Proprietary license structure, Claude Opus 4.8 is served via high-throughput managed API endpoints designed for low-latency production queries.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, Claude Opus 4.8 demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (76.5%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (59.5%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (57.9%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (82.7%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (1890 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.0M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 57 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: API consumption is billed at $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens, offering predictable scaling for high-volume enterprise traffic.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- Strong knowledge work on GDPVal-AA (1890 Elo) and SWE-Pro (69.2%)
- High frontend synthesis on QwenReactBench (1694 Elo) and CoWorkBench (72.3%)
- Solid desktop computer use on OSWorld-Verified (83.4%) and 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.1
Known Considerations
- Higher API inference price per 1M tokens ($7.22)
Recommended Use Cases
Complex reasoning tasks, nuanced long-form analysis, and mission-critical code review.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About Claude Opus 4.8
What is Claude Opus 4.8 and who developed it?↓
Can Claude Opus 4.8 handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Why does Claude Opus 4.8 cost more than most alternatives?↓
What is Claude Opus 4.8 best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Claude Opus 4.8?↓
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Benchmarks: SWE-bench Verified and Agent Tasks
Claude Sonnet 5: Permanent $2/$10 Pricing and Developer Impact
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.