Gemini 3.8 Flash
Monthly API Cost Calculator
Gemini 3.8 Flash rates: $0.75/1M input • $3.75/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.
Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Gemini 3.8 Flash against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Gemini 3.8 Flash Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash by Google is a frontier high-speed model scoring 56.8 overall with #1 rankings on Terminal-bench 2.1 (89.4%), Vals Finance Agent v2 (61.4%), Harvey Legal (10.0%), and HLE-Verified (54.9%).
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •#1 Global Terminal Coding on Terminal-bench 2.1 (89.4%) and 73.7% on DeepSWE v1.1
- •#1 Financial & Legal Agent Autonomy on Vals Finance Agent v2 (61.4%) and Harvey Legal Agent (10.0%)
- •#1 Multidisciplinary Reasoning on HLE-Verified (54.9%) and Biology on LABBench2 (86.2%)
- •#1 Long Video Understanding on LVBench (87.8% agentic / 87.1% static) with 175 tps speed
Limitations & Considerations
- •Subject to standard provider rate limits and API quota
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google DeepMind as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, Gemini 3.8 Flash registers an overall benchmark rating of 56.8 / 100.
Operating under a Proprietary license structure, Gemini 3.8 Flash is served via high-throughput managed API endpoints designed for low-latency production queries.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, Gemini 3.8 Flash demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (73.7%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (62.5%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (62.5%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (89.4%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (1545 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.0M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 297 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: API consumption is billed at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $3.75 per 1M output tokens, offering predictable scaling for high-volume enterprise traffic.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- #1 Global Terminal Coding on Terminal-bench 2.1 (89.4%) and 73.7% on DeepSWE v1.1
- #1 Financial & Legal Agent Autonomy on Vals Finance Agent v2 (61.4%) and Harvey Legal Agent (10.0%)
- #1 Multidisciplinary Reasoning on HLE-Verified (54.9%) and Biology on LABBench2 (86.2%)
- #1 Long Video Understanding on LVBench (87.8% agentic / 87.1% static) with 175 tps speed
Known Considerations
- Subject to standard provider rate limits and API quota
Recommended Use Cases
Terminal coding orchestration, financial analyst tasks, complex legal workflows, high-speed multimodal streaming, and scientific biology research.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About Gemini 3.8 Flash
What is Gemini 3.8 Flash and who developed it?↓
Can Gemini 3.8 Flash handle very long documents and codebases?↓
How much does Gemini 3.8 Flash cost per million tokens?↓
What is Gemini 3.8 Flash best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Gemini 3.8 Flash?↓
Compare Gemini 3.8 Flash With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: Coding and Autonomous Agent Comparison
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.