DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek is a 1.6T MoE (49B active) frontier model pre-trained on 33T tokens with 3206 Codeforces rating and 80.6 on SWE Verified.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •Exceptional competitive coding with 3206 Codeforces rating and 93.5 on LiveCodeBench
- •1.6T total MoE architecture with 49B active parameters pre-trained on 33T tokens
- •80.6 resolved on SWE Verified, 90.1 GPQA Diamond, and 1554 GDPVal-AA Elo
Limitations & Considerations
- •Requires high VRAM infrastructure for local multi-GPU deployment
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is developed by DeepSeek as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max registers an overall benchmark rating of 54.2 / 100.
Operating under a Open Weights license structure, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is distributed as an open-weights architecture capable of local deployment, private VPC inference, and custom fine-tuning.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (80.6%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (58.4%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (58.4%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (67.9%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (1554 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.0M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 50 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: Zero per-token inference fee when self-hosted on owned GPU infrastructure (e.g. vLLM or Ollama), with marginal costs limited strictly to hardware compute.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- Exceptional competitive coding with 3206 Codeforces rating and 93.5 on LiveCodeBench
- 1.6T total MoE architecture with 49B active parameters pre-trained on 33T tokens
- 80.6 resolved on SWE Verified, 90.1 GPQA Diamond, and 1554 GDPVal-AA Elo
Known Considerations
- Requires high VRAM infrastructure for local multi-GPU deployment
Recommended Use Cases
Self-hosted competitive programming, advanced mathematical theorem proving, and automated SWE workflows.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
What is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and who developed it?↓
Can DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Can I self-host DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?↓
What is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max best at?↓
What should you watch out for with DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?↓
Compare DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
AMD AI Developer Program: Fireworks or Developer Cloud Credit Terms
Best LLMs for Coding in 2026: How to Compare Them
DeepSeek Harness: Architecture, Tool Execution, and Setup Guide
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.