GPT-5.4
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing GPT-5.4 against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where GPT-5.4 Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
GPT-5.4 by OpenAI is an xHigh reasoning model scoring 53.8 overall with 3168 Codeforces rating and 75.1 on Terminal Bench 2.0.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •3168 Codeforces competitive coding rating and 97.7 on HMMT 2026 Feb
- •93.0 on GPQA Diamond and 91.4 on IMOAnswerBench
- •Strong agent tool execution on Toolathlon (54.6) and Apex (54.1)
Limitations & Considerations
- •Subject to standard provider rate limits and API quota
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, GPT-5.4 registers an overall benchmark rating of 53.8 / 100.
Operating under a Proprietary license structure, GPT-5.4 is served via high-throughput managed API endpoints designed for low-latency production queries.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, GPT-5.4 demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (72.5%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (58.2%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (58.2%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (75.1%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (1674 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.1M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 14 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: API consumption is billed at $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens, offering predictable scaling for high-volume enterprise traffic.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- 3168 Codeforces competitive coding rating and 97.7 on HMMT 2026 Feb
- 93.0 on GPQA Diamond and 91.4 on IMOAnswerBench
- Strong agent tool execution on Toolathlon (54.6) and Apex (54.1)
Known Considerations
- Subject to standard provider rate limits and API quota
Recommended Use Cases
Enterprise mathematical theorem solving, automated terminal tasks, and competitive algorithm synthesis.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About GPT-5.4
What is GPT-5.4 and who developed it?↓
Can GPT-5.4 handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Why does GPT-5.4 cost more than most alternatives?↓
What is GPT-5.4 best at?↓
What should you watch out for with GPT-5.4?↓
Compare GPT-5.4 With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
ChatGPT Plus Four-Month Student Promotion: Eligibility, SheerID, and Billing Terms
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna: API Pricing and Evaluation
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.