Hy3
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Hy3 against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Hy3 Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Hy3 by Tencent is an open source foundation model ranking on the global AI leaderboard with an overall benchmark score of 42.9.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •Open source foundation weights under permissive licensing
- •70.8 on Terminal Bench 2.1 and 56.2 on Toolathlon
- •Self-hostable local enterprise architecture
Limitations & Considerations
- •Lower coding pass rates on modern benchmarks (32.9 SWE Atlas / 28.0 DeepSWE) compared to next-generation Hy4
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Hy3 is developed by Tencent as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, Hy3 registers an overall benchmark rating of 42.9 / 100.
Operating under a Open Weights license structure, Hy3 is distributed as an open-weights architecture capable of local deployment, private VPC inference, and custom fine-tuning.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, Hy3 demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (32.9%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (42%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (42%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (70.8%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 256K tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 50 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: Zero per-token inference fee when self-hosted on owned GPU infrastructure (e.g. vLLM or Ollama), with marginal costs limited strictly to hardware compute.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- Open source foundation weights under permissive licensing
- 70.8 on Terminal Bench 2.1 and 56.2 on Toolathlon
- Self-hostable local enterprise architecture
Known Considerations
- Lower coding pass rates on modern benchmarks (32.9 SWE Atlas / 28.0 DeepSWE) compared to next-generation Hy4
Recommended Use Cases
Legacy self-hosted deployments, localized enterprise inference, and custom fine-tuning.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About Hy3
What is Hy3 and who developed it?↓
What context window and inference speed does Hy3 offer?↓
Can I self-host Hy3?↓
What is Hy3 best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Hy3?↓
Compare Hy3 With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Tencent Hy4 Preview: 770B MoE Architecture and 1M Context Window
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.