MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Monthly API Cost Calculator
MiMo-V2.6-Pro rates: $0.44/1M input • $0.87/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.
Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing MiMo-V2.6-Pro against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where MiMo-V2.6-Pro Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi is a top-tier frontier multimodal model ranking #11 globally with a 56.5 overall score, 78.4% on SWE-bench Verified, 1,745 Arena Elo, and 49.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at $0.44/1M.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •World-class cost-to-intelligence ratio: 78.4% SWE-bench Verified and 65.2% GPQA Diamond at just $0.44/1M
- •1,745 LMSYS Arena Elo and 1,585 AA-Briefcase Elo rivaling western flagships
- •Full 1M token context window with native multimodal vision, document analysis, and tool orchestration
Limitations & Considerations
- •Throughput is balanced (55 tps) rather than ultra-fast
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, MiMo-V2.6-Pro registers an overall benchmark rating of 56.5 / 100.
Operating under a Proprietary license structure, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is served via high-throughput managed API endpoints designed for low-latency production queries.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, MiMo-V2.6-Pro demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (78.4%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (65.2%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (74.5%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (76.2%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (1745 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.0M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 55 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: API consumption is billed at $0.44 per 1M input tokens and $0.87 per 1M output tokens, offering predictable scaling for high-volume enterprise traffic.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- World-class cost-to-intelligence ratio: 78.4% SWE-bench Verified and 65.2% GPQA Diamond at just $0.44/1M
- 1,745 LMSYS Arena Elo and 1,585 AA-Briefcase Elo rivaling western flagships
- Full 1M token context window with native multimodal vision, document analysis, and tool orchestration
Known Considerations
- Throughput is balanced (55 tps) rather than ultra-fast
Recommended Use Cases
Cost-effective agentic coding, complex autonomous workflows, high-difficulty reasoning, and 1M multimodal document processing.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About MiMo-V2.6-Pro
What is MiMo-V2.6-Pro and who developed it?↓
Can MiMo-V2.6-Pro handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Why is MiMo-V2.6-Pro priced so far below its peers?↓
What is MiMo-V2.6-Pro best at?↓
What should you watch out for with MiMo-V2.6-Pro?↓
Compare MiMo-V2.6-Pro With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.