Claude Fable 5.1
Monthly API Cost Calculator
Claude Fable 5.1 rates: $10/1M input • $50/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.
Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Claude Fable 5.1 against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Claude Fable 5.1 Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Claude Fable 5.1 by Anthropic is an advanced reasoning and agentic model scoring 64.2 overall with #1 rankings on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (65.7) and Humanity's Last Exam w/ Tools (65.0%).
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •#1 Global Intelligence Index on Artificial Analysis v4.1.1 (65.7)
- •#1 Multidisciplinary Reasoning on Humanity's Last Exam w/ Tools (65.0%)
- •Frontier agentic coding on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (55.8%) and Terminal-Bench Science (52.6%)
- •Strong professional tool use on BenchCAD (84.3%), AutomationBench (31.4%), and Database Migration (57.8%)
Limitations & Considerations
- •Premium API inference pricing
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic as an advanced foundation model engineered for production enterprise applications, reasoning workflows, and autonomous problem-solving. On the comprehensive RankLLMs composite evaluation index, Claude Fable 5.1 registers an overall benchmark rating of 64.2 / 100.
Operating under a Proprietary license structure, Claude Fable 5.1 is served via high-throughput managed API endpoints designed for low-latency production queries.
Benchmark Performance & Real-World Utility
In standardized laboratory and real-world evaluation suites, Claude Fable 5.1 demonstrates calibrated proficiency across key performance vectors:
-
SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering (67.4%): Measures multi-file GitHub issue resolution. The model demonstrates practical capability in localizing source code bugs, synthesizing functional patches, and passing rigorous integration test matrices. For evaluation methodology, consult our SWE-bench Pro guide.
-
GPQA Diamond Scientific Reasoning (93.7%): Assesses graduate-level domain problem solving across physics, chemistry, and biology, minimizing hallucinations in multi-step deductive arguments. See our Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark analysis.
-
MATH-500 Competition Mathematics (87.8%): Evaluates formal mathematical problem solving and symbolic derivation, providing foundational logic for algorithmic computing.
-
Terminal-Bench Execution (55.8%): Reflects proficiency in interactive command-line environments, shell tool use, and automated DevOps scripting.
-
Code Arena Preference Rating (2045 Elo): Validates human developer satisfaction in blind side-by-side coding evaluations against contemporary alternatives.
Inference Latency & Cost Architecture
- Token Context Window: 1.0M tokens, allowing large documents, multi-file codebases, and long conversation memories to be processed in a single context window.
- Inference Speed: Reference throughput clocks at approximately 65 tokens/second, enabling responsive streaming in developer tools and interactive interfaces.
- Commercial Pricing: API consumption is billed at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens, offering predictable scaling for high-volume enterprise traffic.
Strengths, Limitations & Ideal Workflows
Primary Strengths
- #1 Global Intelligence Index on Artificial Analysis v4.1.1 (65.7)
- #1 Multidisciplinary Reasoning on Humanity’s Last Exam w/ Tools (65.0%)
- Frontier agentic coding on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (55.8%) and Terminal-Bench Science (52.6%)
- Strong professional tool use on BenchCAD (84.3%), AutomationBench (31.4%), and Database Migration (57.8%)
Known Considerations
- Premium API inference pricing
Recommended Use Cases
Complex scientific reasoning, multidisciplinary research, enterprise tool integration, advanced CAD design, and high-difficulty database migrations.
Related Comparisons & Leaderboard Context
- Compare with alternatives in the Model Comparison Engine
- Compare global rankings on the AI Model Leaderboard
- View complete platform index in our HTML Sitemap & Directory
- Explore top coding models in our Best LLM for Coding Guide
Frequently Asked Questions About Claude Fable 5.1
What is Claude Fable 5.1 and who developed it?↓
Can Claude Fable 5.1 handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Why does Claude Fable 5.1 cost more than most alternatives?↓
What is Claude Fable 5.1 best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Claude Fable 5.1?↓
Compare Claude Fable 5.1 With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Benchmarks: June vs Oct 2024
Claude Sonnet 5: Permanent $2/$10 Pricing and Developer Impact
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.