Claude Fable 5.2
Monthly API Cost Calculator
Claude Fable 5.2 rates: $8/1M input • $40/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.
Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Claude Fable 5.2 against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Claude Fable 5.2 Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Claude Fable 5.2 by Anthropic is a next-generation frontier agent model ranking #3 globally with a 69.5 overall score, 69.9% FrontierSWE v2, 89.3% OSWorld 2.1, and 74.2% Humanity's Last Exam.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •Global leadership on FrontierSWE v2 (69.9%) and FrontierCode 2.0 (49.1% Xhigh effort)
- •Exceptional computer use accuracy with 89.3% on OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset)
- •20% price reduction to $8 / $40 per 1M tokens with optional 2.5x Fast Mode
Limitations & Considerations
- •Fast Mode carries premium pricing ($16 / $80 per 1M tokens)
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Claude Fable 5.2 is Anthropic’s flagship frontier agent foundation model, co-released alongside Claude Mythos 5.2. Engineered specifically to excel across autonomous agent loops, continuous computer use, and complex software engineering, Claude Fable 5.2 achieves an overall RankLLMs rating of 69.5 / 100, placing it solidly at #3 globally directly alongside Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5.5.
Introduced with a 20% price reduction over Fable 5.1 to $8.00 per 1M input tokens and $40.00 per 1M output tokens, Fable 5.2 provides a 1,000,000-token context window, native multimodal processing, and an optional Fast Mode that accelerates token generation throughput by up to 2.5x.
Official Anthropic Benchmark Suite
Across rigorous evaluations published by Anthropic comparing Fable 5.2 directly against Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Gemini 4 Carbon, Claude Fable 5.2 secures decisive wins in autonomous execution:
- Agentic Software Engineering & Coding:
- FrontierSWE v2: Scores 69.9%, leading GPT-6 Astra (65.5%), Opus 5.5 (62.3%), Gemini 4 Carbon (61.2%), and Fable 5.1 (56.3%).
- FrontierCode 2.0: Reaches 49.1% under Xhigh effort, outperforming Opus 5.5 (45.5%), GPT-6 Astra (42.8%), and Gemini 4 Carbon (41.1%).
- Computer Use & Workplace Tool Execution:
- OSWorld 2.1 (Offline subset): Sets a new benchmark high of 89.3%, outpacing Opus 5.5 (87.2%), Fable 5.1 (83.5%), Gemini 4 Carbon (81.5%), and GPT-6 Astra (79.5%).
- AutomationBench: Scores 51.4%, nearly doubling Fable 5.1 (31.4%) and beating GPT-6 Astra (41.4%) and Opus 5.5 (42.5%).
- Remote Labor Index (RLI): Achieves 41.3% (High effort), more than double Fable 5.1 (17.9%) and Opus 5.5 (21.3%).
- RoboDojo Sim: Captures 64.9%, significantly advancing physical simulation and robotics planning over previous baselines.
- Multidisciplinary Reasoning & Scientific Research:
- Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools): Achieves 74.2%, leading Opus 5.5 (67.7%), Fable 5.1 (65.6%), and GPT-6 Astra (57.2%).
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: Reaches 74.6%, leading GPT-6 Astra (68.1%) and Gemini 4 Carbon (64.8%).
- WANDR (Agentic Search): Reaches 82.1% relaxed score, surpassing Opus 5.5 (72.3%) and Fable 5.1 (68.7%).
- Chartography (Visual Chart Understanding): Scores 73.4% without tools, outpacing Gemini 4 Carbon (72.5%) and GPT-6 Astra (71.0%).
Deployment & Fast Mode Economics
Claude Fable 5.2 is available across the Anthropic API, Claude Code, and major cloud providers:
- Standard Tier: $8.00 / 1M input and $40.00 / 1M output with $0.20 / 1M prompt caching read.
- Fast Mode: Available for latency-critical agent loops at $16.00 / 1M input and $80.00 / 1M output, delivering up to 180 tokens/sec.
Frequently Asked Questions About Claude Fable 5.2
What is Claude Fable 5.2 and who developed it?↓
Can Claude Fable 5.2 handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Why does Claude Fable 5.2 cost more than most alternatives?↓
What is Claude Fable 5.2 best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Claude Fable 5.2?↓
Compare Claude Fable 5.2 With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Benchmarks: June vs Oct 2024
Claude Sonnet 5: Permanent $2/$10 Pricing and Developer Impact
Every Major AI Model Released in Early November 2026: Benchmarks, API Pricing, and Developer Migration Caveats
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.