InclusionAI•Rank #17NEW

Ling 3.1 Flash

Open Weights • Open Sourcegeneralreasoningcodingagentopen-sourcefast
Leaderboard Score
57.4
Scale: 0 - 100
Throughput Speed
165 tps
Context Window
1M
API Pricing / 1M
Free/Open Source
Parameter Scale
560B MoE

Monthly API Cost Calculator

Ling 3.1 Flash rates: $0.2/1M input • $0.6/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.

Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.

Sourced AI Radar & Benchmarks•9 Evaluated Metrics

Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Comparing Ling 3.1 Flash against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average

0 - 100 Scale
Ling 3.1 Flash
Frontier Top 10 Avg
Open-Source Avg
Performance Vectors

Where Ling 3.1 Flash Leads

Coding & SWETop 10: 80% • OS: 51.1%
68.7%-11.3% vs Top 10
Reasoning & MathTop 10: 89.2% • OS: 52.7%
89.2%+0.0% vs Top 10
Agent & Tool AutomationTop 10: 78.3% • OS: 36.4%
68.5%-9.8% vs Top 10
Terminal & CLI ExecutionTop 10: 66.8% • OS: 46.2%
46.0%-20.8% vs Top 10
MMLU & Knowledge QATop 10: 50% • OS: 86.7%
71.8%+21.8% vs Top 10
Cyber & Security ExploitsTop 10: 86.2% • OS: 81.2%
87.9%+1.7% vs Top 10

All Verified Benchmark Evaluations

Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.

OverallCodingReasoningAgenticTerminalSecurity
Featured Compute Platform

Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters

Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.

Compare With Alternatives →

Executive Analysis & Verdict

Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI is a 560B open-weights MoE model scoring 57.4 overall, leading frontier open models with 75.16% FrontierSWE, 87.90% CyberGym, and 91.67% BrowseComp.

Key Strengths & Highlights

  • •Leads open-weights models on FrontierSWE (75.16%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (46.03% via LingCode)
  • •Standout cybersecurity and defensive patching capability with 87.90% on CyberGym
  • •Exceptional agent search and retrieval with 91.67% on BrowseComp and 85.49% on DRACO

Limitations & Considerations

  • •Requires LingCode harness configuration to reproduce peak terminal coding scores
Recommended Workflows
Autonomous coding agents, cybersecurity vulnerability analysis, and long-horizon tool execution

Architectural Overview & Capability Profile

Ling 3.1 Flash (released as inclusionAI/Ling-3.1-flash-1019 on Hugging Face) is InclusionAI’s flagship open-weights foundation model. Featuring an advanced 560 billion total parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 25 billion active parameters per token, Ling 3.1 Flash combines hybrid linear attention mechanisms with multi-step reinforcement learning from agent environments. On RankLLMs’s calibrated evaluation framework, Ling 3.1 Flash earns an overall benchmark rating of 57.4 / 100, placing it among the premier open-weights developer models globally.

Distributed under a permissive MIT Open-Weights License, Ling 3.1 Flash natively pairs with LingCode—an open agent harness built upon Pi that provides tool orchestration, context preservation, and iterative result verification across an expansive 1,048,576-token context window.

Official Hugging Face Release Benchmarks

Verified multi-suite evaluations released on Hugging Face demonstrate Ling 3.1 Flash trading blows with proprietary frontier flagships like Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol:

  1. Coding & Repository Engineering:
    • FrontierSWE: Scores 75.16%, leading GLM-5.3 (74.34%), Kimi K3 (73.52%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (71.30%).
    • SWE-bench Pro: Reaches 68.74%, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol (64.60%), GLM-5.3 (61.83%), and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (56.77%).
    • SWE-bench Multilingual: Scores 88.50% across cross-lingual codebases.
    • Terminal-Bench 4.0: Achieves 46.03% in the LingCode harness, outperforming GLM-5.3 (41.90%), GPT-5.6 Sol (39.90%), and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (31.20%).
    • SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA: Achieves 64.51%, leading GPT-5.6 Sol (54.00%) and GLM-5.3 (59.00%).
  2. Defensive Cybersecurity & Health:
    • CyberGym: Achieves 87.90%, capturing the top spot across all open and closed frontier models evaluated (surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol at 84.50% and GLM-5.3 at 84.50%).
    • HealthBench Professional: Scores 65.35% in the AQ environment, leading GPT-5.6 Sol (60.76%), Claude Opus 5 (59.80%), and DeepSeek (50.37%).
  3. Agentic Workflows & Multi-Challenge:
    • BrowseComp: Scores 91.67%, surpassing Claude Opus 5 (90.80%) and GPT-5.6 Sol (90.40%).
    • DRACO: Reaches 85.49%, outscoring DeepSeek (79.85%) and GPT-5.6 Sol (77.70%).
    • GDPval-AA v2.1: Records 1,673 Elo, outperforming DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (1,600 Elo) and GPT-5.6 Sol (1,588 Elo).
    • AutomationBench (Public): Scores 52.50%, beating Claude Opus 5 (50.30%) and GLM-5.3 (48.20%).
    • MultiChallenge: Delivers 69.78%, outpacing GPT-5.6 Sol (66.32%) and Claude Opus 5 (64.98%).

Economics & Inference Efficiency

Ling 3.1 Flash delivers exceptional throughput at low cost:

  • Streaming Speed: 165 tokens per second at peak throughput.
  • API Pricing: $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens (blended ~$0.30/1M tokens).
  • Deployment: Full FP8/4-bit weights are available on Hugging Face for direct deployment on vLLM and SGLang clusters.

Frequently Asked Questions About Ling 3.1 Flash

What is Ling 3.1 Flash and who developed it?↓
Ling 3.1 Flash is a open source large language model developed by InclusionAI. It ranks #17 on the RankLLMs composite leaderboard, ahead of 84% of the 95 models we track, with an overall score of 57.4 / 100.
Can Ling 3.1 Flash handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Ling 3.1 Flash supports a 1.0M-token input context window and generates about 165 tps tokens per second in our reference measurements and which is enough to hold entire repositories, long transcripts, or multi-document research sets in a single session..
Can I self-host Ling 3.1 Flash?↓
Yes. Ling 3.1 Flash is released with Open Source licensing, so it can be self-hosted on private infrastructure with no per-token API cost. Check the specifications above for the memory footprint and quantization headroom to plan your hardware.
What is Ling 3.1 Flash best at?↓
Ling 3.1 Flash is strongest in Leads open-weights models on FrontierSWE (75.16%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (46.03% via LingCode); Standout cybersecurity and defensive patching capability with 87.90% on CyberGym; Exceptional agent search and retrieval with 91.67% on BrowseComp and 85.49% on DRACO. Full pillar-by-pillar numbers are in the benchmark tables above.
What should you watch out for with Ling 3.1 Flash?↓
Known trade-offs include: Requires LingCode harness configuration to reproduce peak terminal coding scores. Weigh these against the strengths above for your specific workload.