Ling 3.1 Flash
Monthly API Cost Calculator
Ling 3.1 Flash rates: $0.2/1M input • $0.6/1M output. Pick a workload preset or enter your own token volumes.
Estimates use listed API rates at time of writing; providers may differ in caching discounts, rate limits, and batching pricing.
Capability Radar & Benchmark Scores
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Comparing Ling 3.1 Flash against Frontier Top 10 & Open-Source average
Where Ling 3.1 Flash Leads
All Verified Benchmark Evaluations
Direct Pass@1 and resolution rates across standardized evaluations.
Run Benchmarks on Dedicated AI Clusters
Zero-cold-start inference endpoints with dedicated GPU instances.
Executive Analysis & Verdict
Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI is a 560B open-weights MoE model scoring 57.4 overall, leading frontier open models with 75.16% FrontierSWE, 87.90% CyberGym, and 91.67% BrowseComp.
Key Strengths & Highlights
- •Leads open-weights models on FrontierSWE (75.16%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (46.03% via LingCode)
- •Standout cybersecurity and defensive patching capability with 87.90% on CyberGym
- •Exceptional agent search and retrieval with 91.67% on BrowseComp and 85.49% on DRACO
Limitations & Considerations
- •Requires LingCode harness configuration to reproduce peak terminal coding scores
Architectural Overview & Capability Profile
Ling 3.1 Flash (released as inclusionAI/Ling-3.1-flash-1019 on Hugging Face) is InclusionAI’s flagship open-weights foundation model. Featuring an advanced 560 billion total parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 25 billion active parameters per token, Ling 3.1 Flash combines hybrid linear attention mechanisms with multi-step reinforcement learning from agent environments. On RankLLMs’s calibrated evaluation framework, Ling 3.1 Flash earns an overall benchmark rating of 57.4 / 100, placing it among the premier open-weights developer models globally.
Distributed under a permissive MIT Open-Weights License, Ling 3.1 Flash natively pairs with LingCode—an open agent harness built upon Pi that provides tool orchestration, context preservation, and iterative result verification across an expansive 1,048,576-token context window.
Official Hugging Face Release Benchmarks
Verified multi-suite evaluations released on Hugging Face demonstrate Ling 3.1 Flash trading blows with proprietary frontier flagships like Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol:
- Coding & Repository Engineering:
- FrontierSWE: Scores 75.16%, leading GLM-5.3 (74.34%), Kimi K3 (73.52%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (71.30%).
- SWE-bench Pro: Reaches 68.74%, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol (64.60%), GLM-5.3 (61.83%), and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (56.77%).
- SWE-bench Multilingual: Scores 88.50% across cross-lingual codebases.
- Terminal-Bench 4.0: Achieves 46.03% in the LingCode harness, outperforming GLM-5.3 (41.90%), GPT-5.6 Sol (39.90%), and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (31.20%).
- SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA: Achieves 64.51%, leading GPT-5.6 Sol (54.00%) and GLM-5.3 (59.00%).
- Defensive Cybersecurity & Health:
- CyberGym: Achieves 87.90%, capturing the top spot across all open and closed frontier models evaluated (surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol at 84.50% and GLM-5.3 at 84.50%).
- HealthBench Professional: Scores 65.35% in the AQ environment, leading GPT-5.6 Sol (60.76%), Claude Opus 5 (59.80%), and DeepSeek (50.37%).
- Agentic Workflows & Multi-Challenge:
- BrowseComp: Scores 91.67%, surpassing Claude Opus 5 (90.80%) and GPT-5.6 Sol (90.40%).
- DRACO: Reaches 85.49%, outscoring DeepSeek (79.85%) and GPT-5.6 Sol (77.70%).
- GDPval-AA v2.1: Records 1,673 Elo, outperforming DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (1,600 Elo) and GPT-5.6 Sol (1,588 Elo).
- AutomationBench (Public): Scores 52.50%, beating Claude Opus 5 (50.30%) and GLM-5.3 (48.20%).
- MultiChallenge: Delivers 69.78%, outpacing GPT-5.6 Sol (66.32%) and Claude Opus 5 (64.98%).
Economics & Inference Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash delivers exceptional throughput at low cost:
- Streaming Speed: 165 tokens per second at peak throughput.
- API Pricing: $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens (blended ~$0.30/1M tokens).
- Deployment: Full FP8/4-bit weights are available on Hugging Face for direct deployment on vLLM and SGLang clusters.
Frequently Asked Questions About Ling 3.1 Flash
What is Ling 3.1 Flash and who developed it?↓
Can Ling 3.1 Flash handle very long documents and codebases?↓
Can I self-host Ling 3.1 Flash?↓
What is Ling 3.1 Flash best at?↓
What should you watch out for with Ling 3.1 Flash?↓
Compare Ling 3.1 Flash With Frontier Competitors
Generate side-by-side benchmark evaluations against rival models.
Related Research & Guides
Technical evaluations, coding benchmark breakdowns, and verified testing guides.
Best LLMs for Coding (SWE-bench & Cost Math)
Complete SWE-bench Verified coding leaderboard and cost-per-solved-task benchmarks.
SWE-bench Pro: The Harder Test of Software Engineering
Why contamination-resistant benchmarks matter when evaluating agentic coding performance.
HTML Sitemap & All 85 Model Scorecards
Browse all 85 AI models, specs, providers, and verified benchmark evaluations.